Skip to main content

the lake house

another one of those movies that absolutely make no sense at all (even if i considered the time leap possible).no im still flooded with an immense amount of work i simply don even have the heart to list it all out here. but maybe it's just me. once in a while i love just pretending that the real world is as romantic as Hollywood makes it out to be. ahha.and so quotes from it i absolutely loved.

"You know as well as I do that the light in Barcelona is quite different from the light in Tokyo. And, the light in Tokyo is different from that in Prague. A truly great structure, one that is meant to stand the tests of time never disregards its environment. A serious architect takes that into account. He knows that if he wants presence, he must consult with nature. He must be captivated by the light. Always the light. Always."

"There is someone. It is kind of a long distance relationship. Story of my life. Keep everything at a distance. Everyone. The man who was standing in front of me, the one who wanted to marry me, him, i push away. I run from him. In the meantime, the one man i can never meet; Him, I would like to give my whole heart to.It's nice. It's safe."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mr perfect/miss imperfect

Instead of waiting for the perfect one, work at being the perfect one instead. These words roll off the tongue with ease like a familiar jingle. Yet the former holds an appeal tt the latter can never achieve.could it be, that at the end of the day, we are, in fact, more aware of reality than we realise? The former, perhaps, more achievable than the latter?

pro-cras-in-a-tion.

one of those moments when i get distracted from the task at hand, oh the joys of the internet. i dont know what catches my eye more, the light, the subtle suggestions of melting shadows, or an unadulterated expression of love, that comfortable lingering silence in company?

the ego of man

so this caught my eye from the red center during studios today. The question of religion and God certainly never fails to draw the crowds: from a question of God's existence, one is defined.yet through it, I'm amazed yet again of how self absorbed humans can be. In our pursuit to find out who we are, theists, atheists, or nihilists, we got the order so wrong. For is the conclusion to this question even one tt is up to our disgression, or should it be that whoever we claim to be is inconsequential, for the question is really an answer that has to be accepted nonetheless..?