mid week(sorta!) joys.

endured a painful day at school struggling to stay awake but failing every single time, handed studio in,cleaned my sty of a room and here i am now blogging, a routine that had set in almost subconsciously. if only i were that diligent when i comes to reading the bible daily.

but as i allow my thoughts to linger on, i am stopped short in my tracks by a nagging thought-- when, why, and how did reading the bible become one of those 'to do' items in my never ending lists? when, why and how did it become (even though i hate to admit it) a duty i had to fulfill as a christian?

how easy we forget, the significance of the bible and the word.

for, without it, can we possibly even dream of a relationship with God? and if the latter never existed, chances of even understanding the bible is zilch--why even the talk about how reading it might be a burden anyway?

off to put my thoughts into action--one down(thank God!) and another to go! (:

Comments

Mr perfect/miss imperfect

Instead of waiting for the perfect one, work at being the perfect one instead. These words roll off the tongue with ease like a familiar jingle. Yet the former holds an appeal tt the latter can never achieve.could it be, that at the end of the day, we are, in fact, more aware of reality than we realise? The former, perhaps, more achievable than the latter?

pro-cras-in-a-tion.

one of those moments when i get distracted from the task at hand, oh the joys of the internet. i dont know what catches my eye more, the light, the subtle suggestions of melting shadows, or an unadulterated expression of love, that comfortable lingering silence in company?

the ego of man

so this caught my eye from the red center during studios today. The question of religion and God certainly never fails to draw the crowds: from a question of God's existence, one is defined.yet through it, I'm amazed yet again of how self absorbed humans can be. In our pursuit to find out who we are, theists, atheists, or nihilists, we got the order so wrong. For is the conclusion to this question even one tt is up to our disgression, or should it be that whoever we claim to be is inconsequential, for the question is really an answer that has to be accepted nonetheless..?

life's mean reds.

Search This Blog